A man-cub named Mowgli fostered by wolves. After a threat from the tiger Shere Khan, Mowgli is forced to flee the jungle, by which he embarks on a journey of self discovery with the help of the panther, Bagheera and the free-spirited bear, Baloo.
This movie contains 12 potentially triggering events.
No, but parts of an ancient stone temple collapse while characters are inside it, and a character (talking orangutang) gets buried in rubble (but is shown to burst back out unharmed during the end credits).
As you probably know, the whole movie is about a boy that was found alone in the jungle as a toddler. He wasn't left to his own devices on purpose or due to indifference, but because the only adult present (his father) was killed. The boy faces dangers, first and foremost in the form of a tiger that wants to kill him, a python that wants to eat him (and almost succeeds with the help of hypnosis), and a giant ape that has its monkey minions kidnap him because it wants to make use of his ability to make fire. I wouldn't call any of that "abuse", especially since the boy escapes before the ape gets to use him. N.B.: Neither of the antagonists are loved and/or trusted figures in the boy's life.
A wolf (good guy) dies from being hit hard by a tiger, which sends the wolf flying several meters. A tiger (bad guy) dies from falling into fire. A bear (good guy) looks as if it's dead or dying from a huge bite, but it ends up being fine.
A man gives a tiger a face burn, but that's in self-defense. No human abuses an animal in the movie, unless you count the instances when Mowgli breaks off parts of some bees' honeycombs for a bear's consumption.
A tiger briefly holds a wolf cub back with its paw to threaten the cub's mother. A python coils itself around a 12-year-old boy and keeps him there for a while. Other than that, no - as far as I can recall.
It looks like a gigantic orangutang-like ape gets crushed under part of a building, but during the end credits we see the ape bursting out from under the rubble. Still, it might be triggering, so I'm answering Yes.
A tiger falls into a sea of fire. We see it from above as it falls, roaring, with its face and belly towards the "camera". We see it disappear into the fire, but we don't see the fire's effect on its body.
Not that we know of as such, but some characters are exposed to things that would break their bones in real life - such as small monkeys being thrown or rolled over by a big bear, and various animals being swatted by a big tiger.
A toddler is benevolently taken (by a talking panther) from a place in the jungle where he's left alone due to his father's death. One might argue that the boy COULD have been found by humans if the panther hadn't taken him, but since no humans were present, and since the panther takes him to save his life, I wouldn't call it an abduction. Plus, of course, he's not an infant.
A boy of about 12 is trapped in a python's coils and a split second away from being eaten, but he's rescued, unharmed. He's in danger many times throughout the movie, but the only physical harm that comes to him is a superficial cut to his chest from a tiger's claw.
No, nor any medical care (except when a boy puts a bit of honey on some bee stings on his torso). The only inside spaces are in an ancient temple inhabited by monkeys. There are no health problems of any kind, only some injuries.
No, but someone is in danger of drowning: There's a major landslide which sweeps a boy into a river. The current is strong, and he has to struggle to get back on land. It's dramatic, but doesn't last very long. He saves himself by managing to cling/climb onto a floating tree trunk and thus stay above water, and soon after, we cut to him still on the trunk, but now in still waters, safe. Some clips of his dramatic struggle are filmed from below the surface.