The storyline centers on a woman being investigated for the murder of her dead husband. During the investigation, the detective first suspects an accident or suicide and ends up believing it to be murder. The key witness turns out to be the blind son of the couple, who faces a moral dilemma…
This movie contains 34 potentially triggering events.
The film centres around the death of the main characters husband, but I wouldn’t consider himself a main character as there are only a few scenes with him when he was alive as flashbacks. The first time he is seen is when he is already dead.
A dog is deliberately given pills, but throws them up and is okay. It is pretty upsetting and realistic.
There is talk about someone attempting suicide via pills, you hear about the details but don’t see it.
a past event involving someone vomiting is described in detail multiple times throughout - when mentioning it in trial about an hour/halfway in, there is an immediate cut to the vomit for a few seconds before the camera moves away. the actual action is never show. later on (MILD SPOILERS!!) after daniel feeds the dog aspirin, the guardian makes it drink salt water in an effort to get it to vomit. you can look away when they pour salt water in his mouth. the dog then vomits on screen and the vomit is briefly seen.
The movie centres around if someone committed suicide or was murdered. While you don’t see the death, you see some flashes of what could have happened, and they discuss it in detail during a trial.
In the end, you know how the court rules, but still don’t see how it happened.
about 38 mins in there are very bright camera flashes. i had to look away. more camera flashes later, basically whenever you see reporters/press, look away.
when the husband is found dead in the first scene, he has a pool of blood around his head and some blood around him. this image is shown many times throughout the film but it is not overly graphic. during an autopsy, the head wound is seen much closer but only briefly.